Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 57 Fragile Recovery
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Madsen Board President
Alex Konen Board President
Linda Beversdorf Treasurer
Cheryl Folkerts Board Member
Linda Blohowik Board Member
Tom Madsen Board Member
Ryan Winn Board Member
David Plekenpol Board Member
Jeremy Gretzinger Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 20 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 18 points above the peer median (65 vs. 47).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.