Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
44
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 28.7% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 20.2% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 22.5% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 15.1% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 14.9% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 13.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2016 18.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 19.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 21.4% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 15.5% 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMIE LAFRENIERE EXECUTIVE DI 14.9% of Rev
KEVIN SUTTERLIN MUSIC DIRECT 9.3% of Rev
JEFF AMSTUTZ Board Member
BRUCE ATWELL Board Member
KIMBERLY BARRETT Board Member
SHAIA BERNARD Board Member
TARA BRZOZOWSKI Board Member
JOHN BYKOWSKI Board Member
SHERRY COLEY Board Member
PRISCILLA DANIELS PARTNER CHAI
MARK DISHAW Board Member
KATHI DRAKE Board Member
MARK FOGARTY Board Member
NICK GEFFERS Board Member
MARY GRONBACH Board Member
DAVID HAAS Board Member
SANDRA HUPFER PAST PRESIDE
JULIE KILEY Board Member
MIKE LOKENSGARD Board President
CATHY MUTSCHLER Board President
DAWN NOWAKOWSKI Board Member
RICH REDMAN Board Member
STEFANIE SCHUH Treasurer
MEGAN WOOLF Board Member
JERRY ZABRONSKY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMIE LAFRENIERE EXECUTIVE DI 15.5% of Rev
KEVIN SUTTERLIN MUSIC DIRECT 6.9% of Rev
JEFF AMSTUTZ Board Member
BRUCE ATWELL Board Member
SHAIA BERNARD Board Member
JARRAD BITTNER Board Member
TARA BRZOZOWSKI Board Member
SHERRY COLEY Board Member
MARK DISHAW Board Member
KATHI DRAKE Board Member
MARK FOGARTY Board Member
NICK GEFFERS Board Member
MARY GRONBACH Treasurer
SANDRA HUPFER Board President
JULIE KILEY Board Member
MIKE LOKENSGARD Board President
CATHY MUTSCHLER Board Member
RICH REDMAN Board Member
STEFANIE SCHUH Secretary
ADDIE TEETERS PAST PRESIDE
JERRY ZABRONSKY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMIE LAFRENIERE EXECUTIVE DI 12.6% of Rev
KEVIN SUTTLIN MUSIC DIRECT 7.2% of Rev
JEFF AMSTUTZ Board Member
BRUCE ATWELL Board Member
SHAIA BERNARD Board Member
JARRAD BITTNER Board Member
RENEE BOLDT Board Member
TARA BRZOZOWSKI Board Member
SHERRY COLEY Board Member
PRISCILLA DANIELS Board Member
KATHI DRAKE Board Member
SARAH ANN DRESSEL Board Member
MARK FOGARTY Board Member
NICK GEFFERS Board Member
MARY GRONBACH Treasurer
TODD HEID Board Member
SANDRA HUPFER Board President
JULIE KILEY Board Member
MIKE LOKENSGARD Board President
CATHY MUTSCHLER Board Member
RICH REDMAN Board Member
STEFANIE SCHUH Board Member
ADDIE TEETERS PAST PRESIDE
JERRY ZABRONSKY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 104 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 44 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.