Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
44
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 — — 28.7% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 20.2% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 22.5% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 15.1% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 14.9% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 13.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 18.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 19.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 21.4% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 15.5% 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMIE LAFRENIERE EXECUTIVE DI 14.9% of Rev
KEVIN SUTTERLIN MUSIC DIRECT 9.3% of Rev
JEFF AMSTUTZ Board Member —
BRUCE ATWELL Board Member —
KIMBERLY BARRETT Board Member —
SHAIA BERNARD Board Member —
TARA BRZOZOWSKI Board Member —
JOHN BYKOWSKI Board Member —
SHERRY COLEY Board Member —
PRISCILLA DANIELS PARTNER CHAI —
MARK DISHAW Board Member —
KATHI DRAKE Board Member —
MARK FOGARTY Board Member —
NICK GEFFERS Board Member —
MARY GRONBACH Board Member —
DAVID HAAS Board Member —
SANDRA HUPFER PAST PRESIDE —
JULIE KILEY Board Member —
MIKE LOKENSGARD Board President —
CATHY MUTSCHLER Board President —
DAWN NOWAKOWSKI Board Member —
RICH REDMAN Board Member —
STEFANIE SCHUH Treasurer —
MEGAN WOOLF Board Member —
JERRY ZABRONSKY Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMIE LAFRENIERE EXECUTIVE DI 15.5% of Rev
KEVIN SUTTERLIN MUSIC DIRECT 6.9% of Rev
JEFF AMSTUTZ Board Member —
BRUCE ATWELL Board Member —
SHAIA BERNARD Board Member —
JARRAD BITTNER Board Member —
TARA BRZOZOWSKI Board Member —
SHERRY COLEY Board Member —
MARK DISHAW Board Member —
KATHI DRAKE Board Member —
MARK FOGARTY Board Member —
NICK GEFFERS Board Member —
MARY GRONBACH Treasurer —
SANDRA HUPFER Board President —
JULIE KILEY Board Member —
MIKE LOKENSGARD Board President —
CATHY MUTSCHLER Board Member —
RICH REDMAN Board Member —
STEFANIE SCHUH Secretary —
ADDIE TEETERS PAST PRESIDE —
JERRY ZABRONSKY Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMIE LAFRENIERE EXECUTIVE DI 12.6% of Rev
KEVIN SUTTLIN MUSIC DIRECT 7.2% of Rev
JEFF AMSTUTZ Board Member —
BRUCE ATWELL Board Member —
SHAIA BERNARD Board Member —
JARRAD BITTNER Board Member —
RENEE BOLDT Board Member —
TARA BRZOZOWSKI Board Member —
SHERRY COLEY Board Member —
PRISCILLA DANIELS Board Member —
KATHI DRAKE Board Member —
SARAH ANN DRESSEL Board Member —
MARK FOGARTY Board Member —
NICK GEFFERS Board Member —
MARY GRONBACH Treasurer —
TODD HEID Board Member —
SANDRA HUPFER Board President —
JULIE KILEY Board Member —
MIKE LOKENSGARD Board President —
CATHY MUTSCHLER Board Member —
RICH REDMAN Board Member —
STEFANIE SCHUH Board Member —
ADDIE TEETERS PAST PRESIDE —
JERRY ZABRONSKY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 44 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.