Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Honors and celebrates theatrical heritage while building a sustainable foundation for future years."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
32
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 5.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 10.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 59.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 9.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 6.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 5.0% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 4.5% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 3.3% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 2.2% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 2.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 2.1% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 2.1% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 — — 1.8% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Erik Vose Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
Jay Lokken Board President —
Mary Isaacs Treasurer —
Mary Rathgaber Secretary —
Joe Hammes Board President —
Neal Meier Board President —
Bradley Weber Board Member —
Stephen Conrad Board Member —
Monica Organ Board Member —
Carolyn Colleen Board Member —
Richard Reynertson Board Member —
Dick Record Board Member —
Marlene De La Cruz-Guzman Board Member —
Kelly Galvan Board Member —
Randy Nelson Board Member —
Mark Solyst Board Member —
Pat Heim Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jason Sullivan Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
Erik Vose Board Member 3.4% of Rev
Brady Lowe Board Member —
Lynnetta Kopp Board Member —
Richard Reynertson Board Member —
Rob Reider Board Member —
Dick Record Board Member —
Mary Ann Gschwind Board Member —
Stephen Conrad Board Member —
Clara Gelatt Board Member —
Jay Lokken Board President —
Pat Heim Board President —
Mary Isaacs Treasurer —
Bradley Weber Board President —
Mary Rathgaber Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GRANT GOLSON Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
DOMINIQUE LUECKE Board Member 0.0% of Rev
PATRICIA SPRANG Treasurer —
SUSAN MCDONALD-CONROY Board President —
STACEY EVERSON Board Member —
PAT HEIM Board Member —
TAMERA HILL Board Member —
BRADLEY WEBER Board President —
MARY ANN GSCHWIND - TERM ENDS 2020 Secretary —
TIM KOLEK Board Member —
MARY ISAACS - TERM ENDS 2020 Board President —
BILL KOUTSKY - TERM 2023 Board Member —
BRADY LOWE - TERM ENDS 2021 Board Member —
MARY RATHGABER Board Member —
MIKE HERRO Board President —
JOAN TEMPLE Board Member —
KATHY VAN KIRK-PRZYWOJSKI Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points below the peer median (0 vs. 56).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.