Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 21.0% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 24.4% 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 24.3% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 22.7% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 19.0% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 9.4% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 8.8% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 8.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 9.4% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 9.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 4.3% 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAN HENRY F&O MANAGER 9.2% of Rev
DOMINIQUE LUECKE EXECUTIVE DI 8.7% of Rev
EVA MARIE RESTEL EXECUTIVE DI 5.7% of Rev
ERIC ERICKSON Board President
JENNIFER KLOEHN PAST PRESIDE
SEAN O'FLAHERTY Board President
SHAWN HANSON Treasurer
LU ANN CAGIN Secretary
GREG BRICKL Board Member
BILL KOUTSKY Board Member
JAN BROCK Board Member
BILL BOSCH Board Member
LESLEY CHARLTON Board Member
NAVID KHEZRI Board Member
ANNETTE MIKAT Board Member
KATIE POTERUCHA Board Member
PETE SCHNEIDER Board Member
CHRIS WALTERS Board Member
MARY ANN GSCHWIND BOARD EMERIT
PAT HEIM BOARD EMERIT
DAVID REEDY BOARD EMERIT
DICK RECORD BOARD EMERIT

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EVA MARIE RESTEL EXECUTIVE DI 10.6% of Rev
JAN HENRY F&O MANAGER 9.2% of Rev
JENNIFER KLOEHN Board President
JAY LOKKEN Board President
SHAWN HANSON Treasurer
LU ANN CAGIN Secretary
GREG BRICKL Board Member
BILL KOUTSKY Board Member
JAN BROCK Board Member
BILL BOSCH Board Member
LESLEY CHARLTON Board Member
ERIC ERICKSON Board Member
ILENE KERNOZEK Board Member
NAVID KHEZRI Board Member
DOMINIQUE LUECKE Board Member
ANNETTE MIKAT Board Member
SEAN O'FLAHERTY Board Member
KATIE POTERUCHA Board Member
PETE SCHNEIDER Board Member
CHRIS WALTERS Board Member
MARY ANN GSCHWIND BOARD EMERIT
PAT HEIM BOARD EMERIT
DAVID REEDY BOARD EMERIT
DICK RECORD BOARD EMERIT

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAN HENRY F&O MANAGER 9.7% of Rev
EVA MARIE RESTEL EXECUTIVE DI 6.7% of Rev
TRACY GASKIN EXECUTIVE DI 0.8% of Rev
SEAN O'FLAHERTY Board Member
KATIE POTERUCHA Board Member
PETE SCHNEIDER Board Member
CHRIS WALTERS Board Member
MARY ANN GSCHWIND BOARD EMERIT
JENNIFER KLOEHN Board President
JAY LOKKEN Board President
SHAWN HANSON Treasurer
LU CAGIN Secretary
GREG BRICKL Board Member
BILL KOUTSKY Board Member
JAN BROCK Board Member
LESLEY CHARLTON Board Member
ERIC ERICSON Board Member
ILENE KERNOZEK Board Member
NAVID KHEZRI Board Member
DOMINIQUE LUECKE Board Member
ANNETTE MIKAT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 104 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.