Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 46 Fragile Recovery
2023 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 61 Stable Stable Watch
2019 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURA FISHER-BONVALLET Board President
MARGARET GONZALES VICE PRESIDE
JEFFREY VERKUILEN Treasurer
ROBERTA CARLSON Secretary
CHRISTOPHER SAMPSON IMMED PAST P
ANDREW PARKS Board Member
VIRGINIA BRAND Board Member
MARY TESCH Board Member
GARY WIESECKEL Board Member
KATHLEEN HEREDIA Board Member
MICHELLE MCQUADE DEWHIRST Board Member
JAMES HARRIS Board Member
THERESA SCHMIDT Board Member
CARL WELLE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SEE SCHEDULE ATTACHED --NONE COMPEN VARIOUS

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SEE SCHEDULE ATTACHED --NONE COMPEN VARIOUS
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 104 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 8 points above the peer median (45 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.