Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.2% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 9.0% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 8.1% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 6.7% 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 7.3% 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 8.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 9.7% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 6.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 11.9% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 13.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 11.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 8.8% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTEN CHESAK EXECUTIVE DI 7.2% of Rev
BOB MILLER Board President —
SIMON A THALMANN VICE PRESIDE —
JACQUELYN DEWATERS Treasurer —
NADEAN KNIGHT Secretary —
JOEL AMOS Board Member —
MICHAEL BEYENE Board Member —
SHONDA BUCHANAN Board Member —
KANDY GRADY Board Member —
THOMAS HAMANN Board Member —
BECKY HARTZELL Treasurer —
KAYLYNN LINSLEY Treasurer —
MONTANA MAJOR Treasurer —
NICOLE MARQUES Board Member —
REMI HARRINGTON Board Member —
ROBIN NOTT Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTEN CHESAK EXECUTIVE DI 7.2% of Rev
BOB MILLER Board President —
SIMON A THALMANN VICE PRESIDE —
JACQUELYN DEWATERS Treasurer —
NADEAN KNIGHT Secretary —
JOEL AMOS Board Member —
LAUREN CARNEY Board Member —
THOMAS HAMANN Board Member —
REBECCA HARTZELL Board Member —
KANDY GRADY Board Member —
MONTANA MAJOR Board Member —
REMI HARRINGTON Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTEN CHESAK EXECUTIVE DI 7.0% of Rev
THOMAS HAMANN Board Member —
REBECCA HARTZELL Board Member —
TIM KILMARTIN Board Member —
ROBERT MILLER Board Member —
SIMON THALMANN Board Member —
ZAC BAUER Board Member —
ANGELITA AGUILAR Board President —
JOHN OLIVER VICE PRESIDE —
ERIC JOHNSON Treasurer —
MARISSA HARRINGTON Secretary —
LAUREN CARNEY Board Member —
CHERYL DICKSON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTEN CHESAK EXECUTIVE DI 6.8% of Rev
LAURA LATIOLAIS Board President —
ANGELITA AGUILAR VICE PRESIDE —
ERIC JOHNSON Treasurer —
MARISSA HARRINGTON Secretary —
KURT SHERWOOD Board Member —
NINA RUIZ Board Member —
CHERYL DICKSON Board Member —
THOMAS HAMANN Board Member —
REBECCA HARTZELL Board Member —
TIM KILMARTIN Board Member —
ROBERT MILLER Board Member —
TAVIAN NAPIER Board Member —
ZAC BAUER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTEN CHESAK EXECUTIVE DI 6.6% of Rev
LAURA LATIOLAIS Board President —
ANGELITA AGUILAR VICE PRESIDE —
ERIC JOHNSON Treasurer —
KURT SHERWOOD Secretary —
REM CABRERA Board Member —
CHERYL DICKSON Board Member —
THOMAS HAMANN Board Member —
MARISSA HARRINGTON Board Member —
REBECCA HARTZELL Board Member —
TIM KILMARTIN Board Member —
ROBERT MILLER Board Member —
TAVIAN NAPIER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 177 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 56 points below the peer median (15 vs. 71).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.