Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 7.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 17.7% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 13.8% 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 28.5% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 7.4% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 16.7% 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 24.6% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 20.5% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 23.6% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 18.7% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVE CRIDER EXECUTIVE DI 9.0% of Rev
JULIE VANGYSEGHEM Board President
TONY HUBBARD Treasurer
MARGARET HAMILTON Secretary
JANELLE RANDALL PAST PRESIDE
DANIELLE KWON PLAYER DIREC
RINZEL ARROYO PLAYER DIREC
STUART DEMING Board Member
BECKY EDMONDS Board Member
JOHN FIORE Board Member
MIKE KAMPHIUS Board Member
JANET THIEME Board Member
RAYMOND WICKS Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVE CRIDER EXECUTIVE DI 6.8% of Rev
LEE FLETCHER FORMER EXECU 0.6% of Rev
ANNA SWANK BOTHWELL Board President
JULIE VANGYSEGHEM VICE PRESIDE
TONY HUBBARD Treasurer
MARGARET HAMILTON Secretary
JANELLE RANDALL PAST PRESIDE
GEORGIA EDMONDS PLAYER DIREC
SARAMARINA PARKS PLAYER DIREC
STUART DEMING Board Member
BECKY EDMONDS Board Member
CINDY GUSTAFSON Board Member
MIKE KAMPHIUS Board Member
JANET THIEME Board Member
RAYMOND WICKS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEE FLETCHER EXECUTIVE DI 6.4% of Rev
JANELLE RANDALL Board President
BETH MCCANN VICE PRESIDE
JULIE PETERSON VICE PRESIDE
MARGARET HAMILTON Secretary
GARY SMITH Treasurer
GENEVIEVE KIM PLAYER DIREC
ASHLEY LANTING Board Member
STUART DEMING Board Member
CINDY GUSTAFSON Board Member
JULIE VANGYSEGHEM Board Member
JAY HECKLER Board Member
KARA MIYASATO Board Member
CHARLIE TOMLINSON Board Member
RAYMOND WICKS Board Member
LEE LANTING Board Member
MATT MILLER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEE FLETCHER EXECUTIVE DI 9.4% of Rev
STUART DEMING Board Member
CINDY GUSTAFSON Board Member
JAY HECKLER Board Member
MARGARET HAMILTON Secretary
GENEVIEVE KIM PLAYER DIREC
ASHLEY LANTING Board Member
LEE LANTING Board Member
KARA MIYASATO Board Member
BETH MCCANN VICE PRESIDE
MATT MILLER Board Member
JULIE PETERSON VICE PRESIDE
JANELLE RANDALL Board President
GARY SMITH Treasurer
CHARLIE TOMLINSON Board Member
JULIE VANGYSEGHEM Board Member
RAYMOND WICKS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEE FLETCHER EXECUTIVE DI 7.3% of Rev
AMY BONNEMA Secretary
STUART DEMING Board Member
DIANE FRYBARGER Board President
CINDY GUSTAFSON Board Member
JULIE VAN GYSEGHEM Board Member
JAY HECKLER Board Member
MARGARET HAMILTON Board Member
ASHLEY LANTING VICE PRESIDE
KARA MIYASATO Board Member
BETH MCCANN Board Member
JULIE PETERSON Board Member
JANELLE RANDALL Board Member
NANCY SPRINGGATE Treasurer
JAN SOLBERG Board Member
CHARLIE TOMLINSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 186 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.