Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 47 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 44 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 44 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie Porter | Board President | — | ||
| Stacee Liaty | Treasurer | — | ||
| Jennifer San Martin | Board President | — | ||
| Jody Gandelman | Publicity/Tickets | — | ||
| Krista Giusti | Meals/Concessions | — | ||
| Ronda Chulick | Fundraising | — | ||
| John Krueger | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie Porter | Board President | — | ||
| Stacee Liaty | Treasurer | — | ||
| Jennifer San Martin | Board President | — | ||
| Jody Gandelman | Publicity/Tickets | — | ||
| Krista Giusti | Meals/Concessions | — | ||
| Ronda Chulick | Fundraising | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 44 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.