Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUE GREGORY Board Member
MARIANNA FIEDOR Board Member
SUSAN GRIGGS Board Member
KENT ALLEN Board Member
NICK LANGE Board Member
OLIVIA PHILLIPS Board Member
PAT BELLINGER Board Member
KELLA CARTER Board Member
TIM ROODVOETS Board Member
CAROL FISCHHABER Board Member
CATHY BENTON Board President
CHERYL BRUFF Treasurer
EMILY CASWELL Secretary
RICK VANHAAFTEN Board President
PAT BELLINGER Board Member
CHERYL BRUFF Treasurer
KELLA CARTER Board Member
CAROL FISCHHABER Board Member
CATHY BENTON Board President
MARIANNA FIEDOR Board Member
RICK VANHAAFTEN Board President
EMILY CASWELL Secretary
NICK LANGE Board Member
KENT ALLEN Board Member
SUSAN GRIGGS Board Member
SUE GREGORY Board Member
TIM ROODVOETS Board Member
OLIVIA PHILLIPS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sue Gregory Board Member
Marianna Fiedor Board Member
Nick Lang Board Member
Susan Griggs Board Member
Sharon Skirke Board Member
Cheryl Bruff Board Member
Pat Bellinger Board Member
Carol Fischhaber Board Member
Kella Carter Board Member
Chris Snow Treasurer
Cathy Benton Board President
Rick Vanhaaften Board President
Emily Caswell Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Pat Bellinger Board Member
Cheryl Bruff Board Member
Kella Carter Board Member
Carol Fischhaber Board Member
Cathy Benton Board President
Marianna Fiedor Board Member
Rick Vanhaaften Board President
Emily Caswell Secretary
Nick Lang Board Member
Chris Snow Treasurer
Dan Mitchell Board Member
Susan Griggs Board Member
Sue Gregory Board Member
Sharon Skirke Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points below the peer median (5 vs. 44).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.