Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
21
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 7.3% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2010 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HOLLY CONROY Secretary
EDWARD M NAHHAT Board President
JAN SCHMITT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HOLLY CONROY Secretary
JAN SCHMITT Board Member
EDWARD M NAHHAT Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EDWARD M NAHHAT Board President
JAN SCHMIT Board Member
HOLLY CONROY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (0 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.