Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 24.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 59 Fragile Recovery
2018 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID BISHOP Board President
ERIC HOPPER VICE PRESIDE
RENEE PICOTTE Treasurer
KEN LANGLOIS Board Member
JACK JOLLIFF Board Member
KNOX KERANEN Board Member
ABIGAIL KERANEN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIC HOPPER VICE PRESIDE 9.9% of Rev
DAVID BISHOP Board President
RENEE PICOTTE Treasurer
KEN LANGLOIS Board Member
JACK JOLLIFF Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID BISHOP Board Member
LEO SIREN Board Member
ERIC HOPPER Board Member
JAMES JESSUP Board President
RENEE PICOTTE Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 24 points above the peer median (65 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.