Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 15.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 13.3% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 14.2% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 10.2% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIANNE BOERIGTER EXECUTIVE DI 4.8% of Rev
MABEL CASEY Board President
THERESE COSAN Board President
LISA JAHR Secretary
JODI DE KUIPER Treasurer
MARTHA KALLENBACH Board Member
JIM HIEFTJE Board Member
GENJI LECLAIR Board Member
RHONDA BUTER Board Member
FRANCIS STANKUS Board Member
DOROTHY PARIS Board Member
JEFF DUBA Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIANNE BOERIGTER EXECUTIVE DI 5.6% of Rev
MABEL CASEY Board President
THERESE COSAN Board President
LISA JAHR Secretary
JODI DE KUIPER Treasurer
TRACY STREICHHIRSCH Board Member
JIM HIEFTJE Board Member
GENJI LECLAIR Board Member
RHONDA BUTER Board Member
FRANCIS STANKUS Board Member
JASON O'CONNELL Board Member
JEFF DUBA Board Member
DOROTHY PARIS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIANNE BOERIGTER EXECUTIVE DI 5.0% of Rev
KEN DELAAT Board President
MABEL CASEY Board President
LISA JAHR Secretary
JODI DE KUIPER Treasurer
MARK MILLER Board Member
DIANE PURGIEL Board Member
SHERRIE HARRIS Board Member
RHONDA BUTER Board Member
THERESE COSAN Board Member
JASON O'CONNELL Board Member
TERRI ORTWEIN Board Member
TRACY STREICHHIRSCH Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIANNE BOERIGTER EXECUTIVE DI 5.0% of Rev
KEN DELAAT Board President
SHERRIE HARRIS Board President
LISA JAHR Secretary
JODI DE KUIPER Treasurer
MARK MILLER Board Member
DIANE PURGIEL Board Member
JAMIE DENSLOW Board Member
CAITLIN VOYT Board Member
DEB REINHOLD Board Member
RHONDA BUTER Board Member
MABEL CASEY Board Member
THERESE COSAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARIANNE BOERIGTER EXECUTIVE DI 4.9% of Rev
KEN DELAAT Board President
SHERRIE HARRIS Board President
LISA JAHR Secretary
JODI DE KUIPER Treasurer
MARK MILLER Board Member
DIANE PURGIEL Board Member
JAMIE DENSLOW Board Member
CAITLIN VOYT Board Member
DEB REINHOLD Board Member
RHONDA BUTER Board Member
MABEL CASEY Board Member
THERESE COSAN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 15 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 33 points above the peer median (60 vs. 27).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.