Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
58
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 4.1% 58 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 6.8% 63 Stable Stable Watch
2021 57 Fragile Recovery
2020 3.6% 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THERESIA ROGERS Board Member 1.1% of Rev
KIMBERLY CARNAHAN Treasurer 0.8% of Rev
DAWN ELDRED Board Member 0.7% of Rev
SAMANTHA WILSON Board Member 0.6% of Rev
ALICIA RIDER Board Member 0.4% of Rev
CHRISTINE CLINTON-CALI Secretary 0.3% of Rev
CHRIS ELDRED Board Member 0.3% of Rev
LINDA PEASLEY Board President 0.2% of Rev
JOHN SLEMP Board Member 0.1% of Rev
HEATHER DOUGLAS Board Member 0.1% of Rev
LYNDA BEDNARCZYK VICE-PRESIDE 0.0% of Rev
AMBER CARNAHAN Board Member
CRISTIAN LABAR Board Member
GILBERT BAZIL VICE-PRESIDE

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THERESIA ROGERS Board Member 1.2% of Rev
DAWN ELDRED Board Member 0.6% of Rev
KIM CARNAHAN Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
LYNDA BEDNARCZYK VICE-PRESIDE 0.5% of Rev
LINDA PEASLEY VICE-PRESIDE 0.4% of Rev
BRIAN BICKEL Board Member 0.3% of Rev
CHRIS ELDRED Board Member 0.2% of Rev
ALICIA RIDER Board Member 0.2% of Rev
CHRIS CLINTON-CALI Board President 0.1% of Rev
HEATHER DOUGLAS Board Member 0.1% of Rev
CRISTIAN LABAR Board Member 0.0% of Rev
AMBER CARNAHAN Board Member
JOHN SLEMP Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THERESIA ROGERS Board Member 1.2% of Rev
SUSAN GRONOW Secretary 0.8% of Rev
DAWN ELDRED Board Member 0.7% of Rev
KEVIN ROGERS VICE-PRESIDE 0.7% of Rev
KIM CARNAHAN Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
LYNDA BEDNARCZYK Board Member 0.5% of Rev
LINDA PEASLEY VICE-PRESIDE 0.4% of Rev
BRIAN BICKEL Board Member 0.3% of Rev
CHRIS ELDRED Board Member 0.1% of Rev
CHRIS CLINTON-CALI Board President 0.1% of Rev
HEATHER DOUGLAS Board Member 0.1% of Rev
ANGELA OTTO Board Member 0.1% of Rev
CRISTIAN LABAR Board Member 0.0% of Rev
SHANNON MANNING Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THERESIA ROGERS Board Member 0.7% of Rev
KIM CARNAHAN Treasurer 0.3% of Rev
KATIE JOHNSON Board Member 0.3% of Rev
KEVIN ROGERS VICE-PRESIDE 0.3% of Rev
SUSAN GRONOW Secretary 0.3% of Rev
CHRIS CLINTON-CALI Board President
LINDA PEASLEY VICE-PRESIDE
BRIAN BICKEL Board Member
DAWN ELDRED Board Member
HEATHER DOUGLAS Board Member
LYNDA BEDNARCZYK Board Member
SHANNON MANNING Board Member
SHERRY RANDALL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 186 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points above the peer median (75 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.