Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 12.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 13.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 7.8% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 23.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 6.2% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 7.9% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 8.5% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 8.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 43 Fragile Recovery
2010 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PENELOPE RAGOTZY DEAN OF SCHO 4.5% of Rev
BRENDAN RAGOTZY Board President 3.9% of Rev
LARRY CEKOLA Board Member
FR BOB CREAGAN Secretary
DAVID FURGASON Board Member
JOHN GALLAGHER VICE PRESIDE
NAKISHA GILLIAM Board Member
KRISTEN KUBICEK Board President
LAURA MROZINSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PENELOPE RAGOTZY DEAN OF SCHOOL 4.7% of Rev
BRENDAN RAGOTZY Board President 3.9% of Rev
PATRICK HUNTER Board Member 3.5% of Rev
KRISTEN KUBICEK Secretary
BILL PARFET Board Member
JOHN GALLAGHER Board President
JOE CEKOLA Board Member
LAURA MROZINSKI Treasurer
NAKISHA GILLIAM Board Member
FR BOR CREAGAN Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PENELOPE RAGOTZY DEAN OF SCHOOL 4.2% of Rev
BRENDAN RAGOTZY Board President 3.8% of Rev
PATRICK HUNTER Board Member 1.2% of Rev
KRISTEN KUBICEK Secretary
GEORGE ELLIS Board Member
BILL PARFET Board Member
JOHN GALLAGHER Board President
LYN KITCHENS Board Member
JOE CEKOLA Board Member
LAURA MROZINSKI Board Member
NAKISHA GILLIAM Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 186 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (0 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.