Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 46 Fragile Recovery
2023 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 39 Fragile Recovery
2011 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE SAMFORD Board President
RYAN BURNS Secretary
YEN CHEN Treasurer
DEIRDRE HENNEBURY Board President
KATHRYN POWELL Treasurer
LAURA BAUMAN Secretary
XIAOMING MAO Co-Fundraising
CAROLYN LOH Fundraising

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Yiling Katharine Chang Board President
Sana Shakour Board President
Debbie Ridley Secretary
Constance Colthorp Amrine Secretary
Yen Chen Treasurer
Joanna Luan Treasurer
Angel Thomas Treasurer
Deirdre Hennebury Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 15 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (15 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.