Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
27
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 — — 17.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 10.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 14.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 12.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 15.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 14.7% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 14.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 16.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BREMER Executive Director 17.3% of Rev
PATTY CERESNIE BOARD MEMEBER —
SUSIE CITRIN Board President —
SUZANNE CURTIS BOARD MEMEBER —
ROSALIND FINK BOARD MEMEBER —
ARLINE GOULD BOARD MEMEBER —
MARCIA KAHN BOARD MEMEBER —
DR PHOEBE MAINSTER Board President —
WENDY KOHLENBERG Board President —
SIDNEY SIMON BOARD MEMEBER —
ELAINE STURMAN BOARD MEMEBER —
KAREN COUF-COHEN BOARD MEMEBER —
HENRIETTA HERMELIN WIENBERG BOARD MEMEBER —
JERRY LAEVIN WEINER BOARD MEMEBER —
MARY LOU ZIEVE Board President —
LYNCH TRAVIS BOARD MEMEBER —
SALLY GINN BOARD MEMEBER —
SUZI TEREBELO BOARD MEMEBER —
ROBERTA TOLL BOARD MEMEBER —
LINDA ZLOTOFF BOARD MEMEBER —
MELINDA NAGLER BOARD MEMEBER —
CAROL OGUSKY Secretary —
ELIZABETH PERNICK Board President —
GAIL K MAYER BOARD MEMEBER —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTOPHER BREMER Executive Director 17.3% of Rev
PATTY CERESNIE BOARD MEMEBER —
SUSIE CITRIN Board President —
SUZANNE CURTIS Board President —
ROSALIND FINK BOARD MEMEBER —
ARLINE GOULD BOARD MEMEBER —
MARCIA KAHN BOARD MEMEBER —
DR PHOEBE MAINSTER Board President —
WENDY KOHLENBERG Board President —
STEVEN SHOWFER Treasurer —
SIDNEY SIMON BOARD MEMEBER —
ELAINE STURMAN BOARD MEMEBER —
KAREN COUF-COHEN BOARD MEMEBER —
HENRIETTA HERMELIN WIENBERG BOARD MEMEBER —
JERRY LAEVIN WEINER BOARD MEMEBER —
MARY LOU ZIEVE Board President —
LYNCH TRAVIS BOARD MEMEBER —
ROBERT SKLAR BOARD MEMEBER —
SALLY GINN BOARD MEMEBER —
SUSIE TEREBELO BOARD MEMEBER —
ROBERTA TOLL BOARD MEMEBER —
LINDA ZLOTOFF BOARD MEMEBER —
MELINDA NAGLER BOARD MEMEBER —
CAROL OGUSKY Secretary —
ELIZABETH PERNICK Board President —
GAIL K MAYER BOARD MEMEBER —
DEBORAH ZAZAIAN BOARD MEMEBER —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 281 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points below the peer median (0 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 27 over 5 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.