Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
42
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 34.0% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 19.8% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 17.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 12.7% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 6.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 11.3% 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 22.0% 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 27.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 28.3% 38 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 — — 23.5% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE GREENHILL Executive Director 13.4% of Rev
LINDSEY BOEHNLEIN ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER 12.6% of Rev
LAUREN KORPI Board Member —
MARCY KUSZ Board Member —
DAN TREGEMBO Board Member —
STACY WOOD Board Member —
CODY DAIG Board President —
JACKIE POWERS Treasurer —
DOUGLAS MUSKETT Board President —
RICHARD JENKINS Secretary —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE GREENHILL THEATRE MANAGER 17.5% of Rev
LINDSEY BOEHNLEIN ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER 16.6% of Rev
SANDY BENTLEY Board Member —
STACY WOOD Board Member —
DAN TREGEMBO Board Member —
LAUREN KORPI Board Member —
MARCY KUSZ Board Member —
RICHARD JENKINS Secretary —
ZONA WICK Board President —
JACKIE POWERS Treasurer —
DOUGLAS MUSKETT Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE GREENHILL Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
DAN TREGEMBO Board Member —
SANDY BENTLEY Board Member —
STACY WOOD Board Member —
RICK SEMO Board Member —
DOUGLAS MUSKETT Board President —
ZONA WICK Board President —
SUSIE FILIPPO Secretary —
JACKIE POWERS Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE GREENHILL Executive Director 8.0% of Rev
SANDY BENTLEY Board Member —
NICHOLE LAHTI Board Member —
CASSANDRA BORDNER STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE —
DAN TREGEMBO Board Member —
RICK SEMO Board Member —
ZONA WICK Board President —
STACY WOOD Treasurer —
SUSIE FLIPPO Secretary —
DOUGLAS MUSKETT Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 20 points below the peer median (42 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 34.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.