Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 48 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — — 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 45.0% 37 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 — — 44.7% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2016 — — 23.9% 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 39 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nathan Jones Executive Director 11.1% of Rev
Julie Badel Board Member —
Graham Jaehnig Board Member —
Mark Spreitzer Board Member —
Thomas Wright Secretary —
Charles Anderson Board Member —
Julie Badel Board Member —
Rebecca Harris Board Member —
Mark Spreitzer Board Member —
Robert Wareham Board Member —
Charles Anderson Board Member —
Rebecca Harris Board Member —
Robert Wareham Board Member —
Daniel Jamison Chairman —
Megan Haselden Treasurer —
Graham Jaehnig Board Member —
Daniel Jamison Chairman —
Thomas Wright Secretary —
Megan Haselden Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIEL JAMISON CHAIRMAN —
ROBERT WAREHAM Treasurer —
GRAHAM JAEHNIG Secretary —
THOMAS WRIGHT Board Member —
JULIE BADEL Board Member —
PENNY MENZE Board Member —
CHARLES ANDERSON Board Member —
JAY MAKI EXECUTIVE DI —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIEL JAMISON CHAIRMAN —
MICHELE SUTHERLAND Treasurer —
ROBERT WAREHAM Secretary —
MICHELE SUTHERLAND Treasurer —
DIANE ST AMORE Board Member —
SHANNON RICHTER Board Member —
MARK DICE Board Member —
TRISH NARHI Board Member —
JANET LOCATELLI Board Member —
SAM LOCKWOOD Board Member —
SHANNON RICHTER CHAIRMAN —
JUSTIN CYGAN VICE CHAIRMAN —
TRISIA NARHI Treasurer —
SHARON TUOVARRA Secretary —
JANET LOCATELLI Board Member —
JERRY MITCHELL Board Member —
SAM LOCKWOOD Board Member —
JEFF HARJU Board Member —
MARK DICE Board Member —
Janet Locatelli Board Member —
Jerry Mitchell Board Member —
Sam Lockwood Board Member —
Jeff Harju Board Member —
Mark Dice Board Member —
Shannon Richter Chairman —
Justin Cygan Vice Chairman —
Trisia Narhi Treasurer —
Sharon Tuovarra Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHANNON RICHTER CHAIRMAN —
JUSTIN CYGAN VICE CHAIRMAN —
TRISIA NARHI Treasurer —
SHARON TUOVARRA Secretary —
JANET LOCATELLI Board Member —
JERRY MITCHELL Board Member —
SAM LOCKWOOD Board Member —
JEFF HARJU Board Member —
MARK DICE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.