Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 56 Fragile Recovery
2023 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 57 Fragile Recovery
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bruce Bradtmiller Board President
Christopher Westhoff Treasurer
Sandra Yang Secretary
Linda Menz Board Member
Phillipa Burgess Board Member
Evan Miller Board Member
Simone Demarzi Board Member
Artie Isaac Board Member
Ashley Lackovich Board Member
Cyndi Pauwels Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Karen Gardner Board President
Lisa Russell Treasurer
Linda Menz Board Member
Valerie Blackwell-Truitt Board Member
Celia Diamond Board Member
Jennifer Cruz Board Member
Dan Zehringer Board Member
Simone Demarzi Board Member
Mary Beth Natarajan Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (80 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.