Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 10.7% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 16.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 13.0% 35 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 10.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 11.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH WATSON EXECUTIVE DI 13.3% of Rev
PATRICIA FISCHER Board Member —
GRACE GARNO Board Member —
MARK HAAG Board Member —
RICHARD HEDRICK Board Member —
ASHLEY HUTCHINSON Board Member —
BRONNA KAHLE Board Member —
CHRIS MILLER Board Member —
BARB MITZEL Board Member —
CHIP MOORE Board Member —
MICHAEL OLSAVER Board Member —
CATHERINE SALA Board Member —
MARK SCHERSTEN Board President —
STEVEN SHERMAN Board Member —
SARAH STANLEY Board Member —
JOSH TEJKL Board Member —
MICHELE BUKU Secretary —
DREW GIETZEN Treasurer —
PATT HAYES Board President —
MILLIE PRUETT Treasurer —
JOANN SANBORN Board President —
JOAN BOWMAN Board Member —
GERRY BURG Board Member —
JIM COLMAN Board Member —
MADELINE DEMARCO Board Member —
TRAVIS ERXLEBEN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH WATSON EXECUTIVE DI 13.0% of Rev
JOAN BOWMAN Board Member —
MICHELE BUKU Secretary —
GERRY BURG Board Member —
JIM COLMAN Board Member —
PATRICIA FISCHER Board Member —
GRACE GARNO Board Member —
PATT HAYES Board President —
RICHARD HEDRICK Board Member —
ASHLEY HUTCHINSON Board Member —
BRONNA KAHLE Board Member —
KATIE MATTISON Board Member —
CHRIS MILLER Board Member —
BARB MITZEL Board Member —
CHIP MOORE Board Member —
MICHAEL OLSAVER Board Member —
MILLIE PRUETT Treasurer —
CATHERINE SALA Board Member —
JOANN SANBORN Board Member —
MARK SCHERSTEN Board President —
STEVEN SHERMAN Board Member —
AMANDA DAVIS SCOTT Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH WATSON EXECUTIVE DI 10.4% of Rev
LARRY BOGUSZ Board Member —
MICHELE BUKU Secretary —
GERRY BURG Board Member —
JIM COLEMAN Board Member —
PATRICIA FISCHER Board Member —
GRACE GARNO Board Member —
PATT HAYES Board President —
ASHLEY HUTCHINSON Board Member —
BRONNA KAHLE Board Member —
KATIE MATTISON Board Member —
CHRIS MILLER Board Member —
BARB MITZEL Board Member —
CHIP MOORE Board Member —
MICHAEL OLSAVER Board Member —
MILLIE PRUETT Treasurer —
CATHERINE SALA Board Member —
JOANN SANBORN Board Member —
MARK SCHERSTEN Board President —
AMANDA DAVIS SCOTT Board Member —
TREVOR VAN VALKENBURG Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 281 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.