Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.8% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 4.2% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 14.6% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 6.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 4.2% 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 4.1% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 4.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 2.5% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 4.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 5.6% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 5.6% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 4.5% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 5.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RUSSELL B COLLINS Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
JANICE WARNER Treasurer 1.8% of Rev
MOLLY ROWAN - DECKART INCOMING ED
DHARMA AKMON Board Member
JAMIE BUHR Board Member
ANNE COOPER Board Member
CHRISTOPHER CONLIN Board Member
RIK CORDERO Board Member
AARON DWORKIN Board Member
ALAN HARRIS Board Member
BARRY MARGOLIS Board Member
PETER SCHORK Treasurer
CHRISTOPHER CONLIN Secretary
KATE TRUMBULL Board Member
KAREN UFER Board President
KATHY WHITE Board President
KIRK PROFIT Board Member
PATRICIA GARCIA Board Member
ANDY COULOURIS Board Member
EDDIE RUBIN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RUSSELL B COLLINS Executive Director 3.1% of Rev
LEE BERRY CHIEF DEV OF 2.8% of Rev
JANICE WARNER Treasurer 2.1% of Rev
DEBORAH BEUCHE Board Member
JAMIE BUHR Board President
CHRISTOPHER CONLIN Board Member
ANNE COOPER Board Member
RIK CORDERO Board Member
AARON DWORKIN Board Member
PAUL FREEDMAN Board Member
ALAN HARRIS Board Member
RIMA HASSOUNEH Board Member
BARRY MARGOLIS Board Member
AGNES MOY-SARNS Board President
PETER SCHORK Treasurer
ALICIA TORRES Board Member
KATE TRUMBULL Board Member
KATHY WHITE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEE BERRY CHIEF DEV OF 2.8% of Rev
RUSSELL B COLLINS Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
JANICE WARNER Treasurer 1.9% of Rev
DEBORAH BEUCHE Board Member
AMANDA BORSUK Board Member
JAMIE BUHR Board President
ANNE COOPER Board Member
RIK CORDERO Board Member
AARON DWORKIN Board Member
PAUL FREEDMAN Board Member
ALAN HARRIS Board Member
PAT JENKINS Board Member
BARRY MARGOLIS Board Member
JENNIFER MOORE Board Member
AGNES MOY-SARNS Board President
HILLARY MURT Board Member
PETER SCHORK Treasurer
ALICIA TORRES Board Member
KATHY WHITE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RUSSELL B COLLINS Executive Director 2.6% of Rev
LEE BERRY CHIEF DEV OF 2.4% of Rev
JANICE WARNER Treasurer 1.9% of Rev
DEBORAH BEUCHE Board President
AMANDA BORSUK Board Member
JAMIE BUHR Board President
ANNE COOPER Board Member
RIK CORDERO Board Member
AARON DWORKIN Board Member
PAUL FREEDMAN Board Member
ALAN HARRIS Board Member
PAT JENKINS Board Member
BARRY MARGOLIS Board Member
JENNIFER MOORE Board Member
AGNES MOY-SARNS Board Member
HILLARY MURT Board Member
PETER SCHORK Board Member
JIM STERKEN Treasurer
ALICIA TORRES Board Member
KATHY WHITE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.