Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 14.3% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 2.7% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 6.8% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 4.5% 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 6.4% 58 Fragile Recovery
2017 5.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 12.1% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 8.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 10.9% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 12.2% 48 Fragile Recovery
2012 15.3% 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW AUBIN EXEC/MUSIC D 6.5% of Rev
SAMUEL BARNES Board President
DEL BELCHER Board Member
BEN BUTTERFIELD Board Member
DANIEL CASILLO Board Member
GAELL CASSIN-ROSS Board Member
SHAWN CHRISTIE Board Member
LAURIE CUNNINGHAM Treasurer
ROBERT DAVY Board Member
RUSS DESY Board Member
STEPHEN FOSTER Board Member
QUENTIN GUINN Board Member
SHAUN HUANG Secretary
JI HUYN KIM Board Member
JON LAKE Board Member
JACKIE LIVESAY Board Member
ANGELA MACHNIK Board Member
VICKI MCFERRAN Board Member
PHILIP MOILANEN Board Member
JAMES PARK Board Member
ANTONIO PARKER Board Member
GREG RUPPRECHT Board Member
ANNIE STEWARD Board Member
LAURA TROMBLEY Board Member
JESSICA WEBB Board Member
DOUG WILCOXSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW AUBIN Board Member 6.1% of Rev
VICTORIA MCFERRAN Board Member
PHIL MOILANEN Board Member
JENNIFER MORRIS Board Member
QUINTEN GUINN Board Member
LARRY HALMAN Board Member
ANGELA MACHNIK Board Member
STEFANIE RIGGS Board Member
LAURA TROMBLEY Board Member
CARLENE WALZ-LEFERE Board Member
JESSICA WEBB Board Member
ANNIE STEWARD Board Member
JOHN WALDRON Board Member
SHAWN CHRISTIE Board Member
STEPHEN FOSTER Board Member
SAM BARNES Board President
DEL BELCHER Board Member
LAURA DWYER SCHLECTE Board Member
EARL POLESKI Board Member
ERIN MAZUR Board Member
THOMAS SPRING Board Member
DAVID CRAFT Board Member
RUSS DESY Board Member
KAREN BUNNELL Board Member
ANITA FOBES Board Member
ROBERT DAVEY Board Member
LAURIE CUNNINGHAM Treasurer
SHAUN HUANG Secretary
DOUGLAS WILCOXSON Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 59 → 38 over 5 years (declining by 21 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.