Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 64 Stable Stable Watch
2020 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 65 Stable Stable Watch
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 61 Stable Decline Risk
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID TRIPPETT Board President
BRUCE CREWS Board President
BARBARA CLIFFE-MILLER Secretary
ANGELA SMITH Treasurer
KRISTI GAUTSCHE Board Member
TIM AMBROSE Board Member
RICKIE FREEMAN Board Member
CYNDI BALDERMAN Board Member
ALLIE CLEVELAND Board Member
AARON GUEST Board Member
TRACY MCCULLOUGH Board Member
AARON GUEST Board Member
ALLISON TAPPEN Board Member
CYNDI BALDERMAN Board Member
MEAGHAN BRYANT Board Member
GIANNA GREEN Board Member
TRACY MCCULLOUGH Board Member
RICKIE FREEMAN Board Member
KRISTI GAUTSCHE Board Member
TIM AMBROSE Board Member
ANGIE SMITH Treasurer
BRUCE CREWS Board President
MANDEE HOWARD Secretary
DAVID TRIPPETT Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (45 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 57 → 49 over 5 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.