Governance Lag
What does this mean?
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
The Path Forward
The Scaffold
Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 53 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 38 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 48 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 35 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 37 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 41 | Financially Distressed | Recovery | |
| 2010 | — | — | — | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anatoli Murha | Treasurer | — | ||
| Boyan Makarenko | Secretary | — | ||
| Victor Lishchyna | Board President | — | ||
| Andriy Hladyshevsky | Board President | — | ||
| Stephen Szyszka | Board President | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anatoli Murha | Treasurer | — | ||
| Theodore Bodnar | Secretary | — | ||
| Victor Lishchyna | Board President | — | ||
| Andriy Hladyshevsky | Board President | — | ||
| Stephen Szyszka | Board President | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wolodymyr Babicky | Board President | — | ||
| Theodore Bodnar | Secretary | — | ||
| Anatoli Murha | Treasurer | — | ||
| Bohdan Pryjma | Board President | — | ||
| Victor Lishchyna | Board President | — | ||
| Danylo Smolilo | Board President | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 45 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points above the peer median (70 vs. 43).
5-year trend: Governance Lag
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.