Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.1% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 1.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 7.5% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 5.1% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 52 Fragile Recovery
2016 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 3.3% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 3.2% 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 4.0% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 2.0% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 2.4% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY MEYERS FOLEY Board Member 2.9% of Rev
SHELLY BARNETTE-DAWSON DEP DIR FOR 2.2% of Rev
ERIN GRAVELYN Board President
LIZBETH O'SHAUGHNESSY VICE-PRESIDE
JIM OVERBECK Secretary
SCOTT BRANC Board Member
PAT BREWER Board Member
JUDY TYNER Board Member
MEG GOEBEL Board Member
JEFFERY GURNEY Board Member
INDIA MANNS Board Member
JANE BOYLES MEILNER Board Member
STEPHANIE NAITO Board Member
ALFIELD REEVES Board Member
CHRISTOPHER ROSMARIN Board Member
CAROL SAROSIK Board Member
JAMES SCHIPPER Board Member
ALEXANDER THIBODEAU Board Member
MITCHELL WATT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANA FRIIS-HANSEN Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
KURT HASSBERGER Board Member
ERIN GRAVELYN Board President
LIZBETH O'SHAUGHNESSY Board President
STACIE BEHLER Board Member
MARILYN CRAWFORD Board Member
MEG GOEBEL Board Member
INDIA MANNS Board Member
JANE BOYLES MEILNER Board Member
JIM OVERBECK Treasurer
CHRISTOPHER ROSMARIN Board Member
CAROL SAROSIK Board Member
EDDIE TADLOCK Board Member
MITCHELL WATT Board Member
SCOTT BRANC Board Member
PAT BREWER Board Member
BRUCE CLIPP Board Member
STEPHANIE NAITO Board Member
ALEX THIBODEAU Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANA FRIIS-HANSEN Board Member 4.6% of Rev
STACIE BEHLER Board Member
MARILYN CRAWFORD Board Member
MEG GOEBEL Board Member
ERIN GRAVELYN VICE PRESIDE
KURT HASSBERGER Board President
CHRISTOPHER HUFNAGEL Board Member
RISHI MAKKAR Board Member
INDIA MANNS Board Member
JANE BOYLES MEILNER Board Member
LIZBETH O'SHAUGHNESSY Secretary
JIM OVERBECK Board Member
CHRISTOPHER ROSMARIN Board Member
CAROL SAROSIK Board Member
EDDIE TADLOCK Board Member
MITCHELL WATT Board Member
MEG MILLER WILLIT Board Member
ANN ZOELLNER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANA FRIIS-HANSEN Board Member 4.4% of Rev
LUIS AVILA Board Member
STACIE BEHLER Board Member
MARILYN CRAWFORD Board Member
SAM CUMMINGS Board Member
JIM ENGELKING Board Member
MEG GOEBEL Board Member
ERIN GRAVELYN VICE PRESIDE
KURT HASSBERGER Board President
CHRISTOPHER HUFNAGEL Board Member
RISHI MAKKAR Board Member
INDIA MANNS Board Member
JANE BOYLES MEILNER Board Member
LIZBETH O'SHAUGHNESSY Secretary
JIM OVERBECK Board Member
KATHLEEN STEWART PONITZ Board Member
CHRISTOPHER ROSMARIN Board Member
CAROL SAROSIK Board Member
EDDIE TADLOCK Board Member
MITCHELL WATT Board Member
MEG MILLER WILLIT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 10 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 20 points above the peer median (60 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.