Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

"A community choral group that provides musical performances twice annually, with all performance funds benefiting other local non-profit organizations."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar

Demonstrated Impact

  • Musical performances twice per year
  • Galesburg Public Schools Foundation was beneficiary of December 2023 performance
  • Galesburg Public Library Foundation was beneficiary of June 2024 performance
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 11.4% 61 Stable Stable Watch
2023 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 41.4% 41 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 54.1% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 1.6% 60 Stable Decline Risk
2019 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alisa Ramer Board Member 7.1% of Rev
Leo Ramer Accompianist 3.0% of Rev
Tim Holmes Choreographer 1.2% of Rev
Gail Coffman Board President —
Deanna Reynolds Board President —
Deb Swisher Board President —
Allison Little Secretary —
Margie Allen Treasurer —
Jeff Johnson Financial Manager —
Carol Maloney Treasurer —
Tammie Brooks Publicity —
Jean Ruebner Membership Development —
Jeff Harshbarger Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alisa Ramer Board Member 7.1% of Rev
Leo Ramer Accompianist 1.5% of Rev
Karen Stevens Previous Accompianist 1.5% of Rev
Tim Holmes Choreographer 1.2% of Rev
Jackie Piper Board President —
Jeff Spencer Board President —
Deb Swisher Board President —
Gail Coffman Secretary —
Margie Allen Treasurer —
Jeff Johnson Financial Manager —
Carol Maloney Treasurer —
Tammie Brooks Publicity —
Jen Stegall Membership Development —
Pam Melvin Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alisa Ramer Board Member 4.6% of Rev
Tim Holmes Choreographer / Producer 3.6% of Rev
Karen Stevens Accompianist 1.5% of Rev
Jackie Piper Board President —
Jeff Spencer Board President —
Pam Melvin Board President —
Gail Coffman Secretary —
Margie Allen Treasurer —
Jeff Johnson Financial Manager —
Liz Cross Publicity —
Carol Maloney Treasurer —
Deb Swisher Board Member —
Jen Stegall Membership Development —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alisa Ramer Board Member 1.0% of Rev
Karen Stevens Accompianist —
Tim Holmes Choreographer —
Jackie Piper Board President —
Jeff Spencer Board President —
Steve Main Board President —
Gail Coffman Secretary —
Margie Allen Treasurer —
Jeff Johnson Financial Manager —
Liz Cross Publicity —
Carol Maloney Treasurer —
Rhonda Brady Board Member —
Jen Stegall Membership Development —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 43 points above the peer median (100 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.