Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 15.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 19.4% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anne Puotinen Board President —
Emily Kefferstan Board President —
Cooper Melgreen Treasurer —
Megan Krone Secretary —
Dave Bartusek Board Member —
Andrea Brands Board Member —
Ramsey Carey Board Member —
Sonya Dekhtyar Board Member —
Stu Kiesow Board Member —
Ted Lowitz Board Member —
Anne Marie Dumas Mitchell Board Member —
Arnold Park Board Member —
Doug Passmore Board Member —
Jessica Schrey Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anne Puotinen Board President —
Anne Marie Dumas Mitchell Secretary —
Sonya Dekhtyar Treasurer —
Dave Bartusek Board Member —
Dave Bock Board Member —
Kelly Carpenter Board Member —
Stu Kiesow Board Member —
Ted Lowitz Board Member —
Cooper Melgreen Board Member —
Doug Passmore Board Member —
Jessica Schrey Board Member —
Ramsey Carey Board Member —
Emily Kefferstan Board Member —
Megan Krone Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cooper Melgreen Board President —
Anne Puotinen Secretary —
Doug Passmore Treasurer —
Dave Bartusek Board Member —
Dave Bock Board Member —
Kelly Carpenter Board Member —
Sonya Dekhtyar Board Member —
Stu Kiesow Board Member —
Ted Lowitz Board Member —
Anne Marie Dumas Mitchell Board Member —
Jessica Schrey Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cooper Melgreen Board President —
Kelly Fitzgerald Secretary —
Doug Passmore Treasurer —
Dave Bartusek Board Member —
Dave Bock Board Member —
Kelly Carpenter Board Member —
Louis Chieng Board Member —
Sonya Dekhtyar Board Member —
Stu Kiesow Board Member —
Ted Lowitz Board Member —
Anne Marie Dumas Mitchell Board Member —
Anne Puotinen Board Member —
Jessica Schrey Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DOUG PASSMORE Board President —
ANNE PUOTINEN Board President —
DAVE BOCK Treasurer —
KELLY FITZGERALD Secretary —
DAVE BARTUSEK Board Member —
KELLY CARPENTER Board Member —
LOUIS CHIENG Board Member —
SONYA DEKHTYAR Board Member —
IAN GALLEHER Board Member —
STU KIESOW Board Member —
TED LOWITZ Board Member —
COOPER MELGREEN Board Member —
ELIZABETH MOORE Board Member —
ANNE MARIE DUMAS MITCHELL Board Member —
JESSICA SCHREY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.