Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Empowers children to share their voices through creative writing workshops, then adapts and performs their stories on stage with professional actor/educators for both school and public audiences."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller

Demonstrated Impact

  • creative writing workshops
  • in-school performances of children's stories
  • public performances
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
36
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 11.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 12.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 10.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIKE LUBIN Board President
DEANNA MYERS Board Member
JACK REICH Board Member
DORI SCALLET Board Member
HARRISON WAYNE SMITH Board Member
ALLISON SOKOLOWSKI Secretary
MERISSA STEWART Board Member
JENNIFER ALLMAN Board Member
ASHLEY BLAND Board Member
STEVE CROTHERS Treasurer
MARY WINN HEIDER VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER ALLMAN VICE PRESIDE
SOPHIA AUDREY Board Member
MARY WINN HEIDER Board Member
MIKE LUBIN Board President
DEANNA MYERS Board Member
JACK REICH Treasurer
DORI SCALLET Board Member
ALLISON SOKOLOWSKI Secretary
MERISSA STEWART Board Member
RAVEN STUBBS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JILLIAN ABBINANTI Board Member
JEN ALLMAN Board Member
DAVID BOROWSKI Secretary
TOM CUEVAS Board Member
MARY FISHER Board Member
JOHN GILMOUR Board President
ERICA HALVERSON Board Member
JOHN GILMOUR Board President
MANDY JONES VICE PRESIDE
MANDY JONES VICE PRESIDE
JOE LEVERING Board Member
ELIZABETH BULLOCK Secretary
LIZ JOYNT SANDBERG Board Member
MAURICIO SARDISCO Treasurer
MAURICIO SARDISCO Treasurer
JEN ALLMAN Board Member
DAVID BOROWSKI Board Member
IMRON BHATTI Board Member
TOM CUEVAS Board Member
ERICA HALVERSON Board Member
EDDIE JOHNSON Board Member
MARY FISHER Board Member
JOE LEVERING Board Member
KAYLA PULLEY Board Member
JILLIAN ABBINANTI Board Member
LIZ JOYNT SANDBERG Board Member
COLETTE GREGORY EXECUTIVE DI
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (10 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.