Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 18.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 16.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 14.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 17.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 17.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 14.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 16.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2010 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wilfredo Rivera Artistic Director 18.1% of Rev
Alec Dike Board President
Brenda Fournier Treasurer
Everlidys Cabrera Board Member
Elliott Crigger Board Member
Bruce Doblin Board Member
Cynthia Gessele Board Member
Judith Gethner Board Member
Sandra McNaughton Board Member
Margaret Murphy-Webb Board Member
Fay Peters Board Member
Joan Simpson Board Member
Elizabeth Sengupta MD Board Member
Tricia Teller-Mendoza Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wilfredo Rivera Artistic Director 18.2% of Rev
Wilfredo Rivera Artistic Director 18.2% of Rev
Brenda Fournier Treasurer
Judy Blue Secretary
Shawn Kennedy Board Member
Alec Dike Board Member
Bruce Doblin Board Member
Cynthia Gessele Board Member
Sandra McNaughton Board Member
Joy Segal Board Member
Elizabeth Sengupta Board Member
Everlidys Cabrera Board Member
Fay Peters Board Member
Brenda Fournier Treasurer
Judy Blue Secretary
Shawn Kennedy Board Member
Alec Dike Board Member
Bruce Doblin Board Member
Cynthia Gessele Board Member
Sandra McNaughton Board Member
Joy Segal Board Member
Elizabeth Sengupta Board Member
Everlidys Cabrera Board Member
Fay Peters Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Wilfredo Rivera Artistic Director 14.1% of Rev
Wilfredo Rivera Artistic Director 12.7% of Rev
Brenda Fournier Board President
Elizabeth Sengupta Secretary
John Bovard Treasurer
Cynthia Gessele Board Member
Brenda Fournier Board President
Judy Blue Secretary
Marie Beckman Board Member
Alec Dike Board Member
Bruce Doblin Board Member
Cynthia Gessele Board Member
Sandra McNaughton Board Member
Joy Segal Board Member
Elizabeth Sengupta Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (5 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.