Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
26
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2019 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RICHARD RESSEGUIE Board Member
ARLYN TOLZMANN Secretary
BERT CROSSLAND Board Member
ANDRE FIEBIG Board President
BOB CHIAPPETTA Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRET CROSSLAND Treasurer
RICHARD RESSEGUIE Board President
ARLYN TOLZMANN Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 196 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 26 over 5 years (declining by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.