Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
39
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 23.3% 39 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 36 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 45.6% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 65.8% 13 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 26.2% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 49.1% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 — — 47.5% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 40.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 35.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 33.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 31.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 32.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 — — 26.9% 36 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW WALLACE Artistic Director 27.9% of Rev
KATHERINE SOLVERSON Board Member —
LAURA TOMACIC Board Member —
LINDA KIRACIBASI Board Member —
BRYAN HALES Board President —
MONIQUE MAYE Board President —
VAN CROCKER JR Treasurer —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW WALLACE Artistic Director 23.3% of Rev
JULIE HILL Board Member —
BRYAN HALES Board President —
MONIQUE MAYE Board President —
VAN CROCKER JR Treasurer —
KATHERINE SOLVERSON Board Member —
LAURA TOMACIC Board Member —
LINDA KIRACIBASI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY BRANAHL Artistic Director 39.1% of Rev
TOM BECK Board Member —
SARA GREENSTEIN Board Member —
LINDA KIRACIBASI Board Member —
DEBRA HATCHETT Board Member —
KATHERINE SOLVERSON Board Member —
LAURA TOMACIC Board Member —
ANDREW WALLACE Board Member —
VAN CROCKER Board Member —
BRYAN HALES Board President —
MONIQUE MAYE Board President —
MARTHA KINZEL Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY BRANAHL Artistic Director 52.2% of Rev
TOM BECK Board Member —
SARA GREENSTEIN Board Member —
LINDA KIRACIBASI Board Member —
MONIQUE MAYE Board Member —
KATHERINE SOLVERSON Board Member —
LAURA TOMACIC Board Member —
OSCAR ALCANTARA Board President —
BRYAN HALES Board President —
MARTHA KINZEL Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY BRANAHL Artistic Director 51.2% of Rev
OSCAR ALCANTARA Board President —
TOM BECK Board Member —
MELISSA CORLEY Board Member —
SARA GREENSTEIN Board Member —
BRYAN HALES Board Member —
MARTHA KINZEL Treasurer —
LINDA KIRACIBASI Board Member —
MONIQUE MAYE Board Member —
KATHERINE SOLVERSON Board Member —
LAURA TOMACIC Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 22 points below the peer median (45 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.