Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 25.2% 54 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2022 30.2% 54 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 40.2% 58 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 34.7% 58 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 45.6% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 51 Fragile Recovery
2010 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2009 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BENJAMIN NADEL Board Member 13.2% of Rev
CARRIE PROVOST CONDUCTOR 6.0% of Rev
DARYL SILERAN CONDUCTOR 6.0% of Rev
KAY BURDI Board President
DAVID GAVIN Board President
JO ANN FOSS Board President
JOE ZHANG Treasurer
SOOJIN KIM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK LIU Board Member 12.0% of Rev
CARRIE PROVOST CONDUCTOR 7.7% of Rev
DARYL SILBERMAN CONDUCTOR 7.7% of Rev
KAY BURDI Board President
SHIRLEY SZE Board President
DAVID GAVIN Board President
JO ANN FOSS Secretary
OLGA SHROFF Treasurer
SOOJIN KIM Board Member
BILL HOTTINGER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK LIU Board Member 12.0% of Rev
CARRIE PROVOST CONDUCTOR 7.7% of Rev
DARYL SILBERMAN CONDUCTOR 7.7% of Rev
KAY BURDI Board President
SHIRLEY SZE Board President
JO ANN FOSS Secretary
DAVID GAVIN Treasurer
PHAVINEE PARK Board Member
SAMIR KHAN Board President
YASMIN KHAN Board Member
DOROTHY CHINCHILLA Board Member
YONHEE GORDON Board Member
DAVID GAVIN Board Member
JULIANA KIM CHAMBER ENSEMBLES COACH

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK LIU Board Member 18.3% of Rev
MARK LIU Board Member 11.4% of Rev
CARRIE PROVOST CONDUCTOR 7.3% of Rev
DARYL SILBERMAN CONDUCTOR 7.3% of Rev
ANNALISE HAUSMAN OFFICE MANAGER 6.0% of Rev
DAVID PETERSONS CONDUCTORS 4.6% of Rev
CARRIE PROVOST CONDUCTORS 0.6% of Rev
DARYL SILBERMAN CONDUCTORS 0.6% of Rev
KAY BURDI Board President
SHIRLEY SZE Board President
JO ANN FOSS Secretary
RITCHIE CHANG Treasurer
PHAVINEE PARK Board Member
SAMIR KHAN Board President
YASMIN KHAN Board Member
DOROTHY CHINCHILLA Board Member
YONHEE GORDON Board Member
DAVID GAVIN Board Member
JULIANA KIM CHAMBER ENSEMBLES COACH
KAY BURDI Board President
SHIRLEY SZE Board President
JO ANN FOSS Secretary
RITCHIE CHANG Treasurer
DELENA OLLILA Board President
PHAVINEE PARK Board Member
SAMIR KHAN Board President
YASMIN KHAN Board Member
SHARENDA BARLAR Board Member
DOROTHY CHINCHILLA Board Member
YONHEE GORDON DIRECTORS
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points above the peer median (80 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 25.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~6 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.