Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.0% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 18.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 26.3% 40 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 11.5% 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 — — 10.6% 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 12.4% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAN GIORDANO Artistic Director 3.5% of Rev
ERICA L EDWARDS Executive Director 3.2% of Rev
CAITLYN OTTENHEIMER OPERATIONS MANAGER 1.5% of Rev
CHRIS D'HONDT Board President —
JENNIFER KASTENHOLZ Board President —
KEVIN JANES Treasurer —
PAULA FRIEDMAN Secretary —
KYLE BARRETTSMITH Board Member —
TARA COPE Board Member —
SANDRA GOLUB Board Member —
KIP HELVERSON Board Member —
CANDACE JORDAN Board Member —
ANN FORD Board Member —
MATT ROMA Board Member —
TINA MONAGHAN Board Member —
JOHN CIPRIANO Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAN GIORDANO Artistic Director 2.3% of Rev
MICHAEL MCSTRAW Executive Director 2.1% of Rev
KIP HELVERSON Board President —
CHRIS D'HONDT Board President —
ANN K FORD Treasurer —
PAULA FRIEDMAN Secretary —
GORMAN COOK Board Member —
TARA COPE Board Member —
DINA GALLAY Board Member —
SANDRA GOLUB Board Member —
RYAN JACOBSON Board Member —
KEVIN JANES Board Member —
CANDACE JORDAN Board Member —
JENNIFER KASTENHOLZ Board Member —
STEWART KERR Board Member —
TINA MONAGHAN Board Member —
MOLLY NEWELL Board Member —
DANIEL SABOL Board Member —
KEITH SANDERS Board Member —
SALLY VENVERLOH Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NAN GIORDANO Artistic Director 1.8% of Rev
MICHAEL MCSTRAW Executive Director 1.8% of Rev
KIP HELVERSON Board President —
CHRIS D'HONDT Board President —
ANN K FORD Treasurer —
PAULA FRIEDMAN Secretary —
GORMAN COOK Board Member —
TARA COPE Board Member —
DINA GALLAY Board Member —
SANDRA GOLUB Board Member —
RYAN JACOBSON Board Member —
KEVIN JANES Board Member —
CANDACE JORDAN Board Member —
JENNIFER KASTENHOLZ Board Member —
STEWART KERR Board Member —
TINA MONAGHAN Board Member —
MOLLY NEWELL Board Member —
DANIEL SABOL Board Member —
MAKENZIE MORTON Board Member —
KEITH SANDERS Board Member —
SALLY VENVERLOH Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 377 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.