Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2019 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 18.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 10.9% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 12.4% 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
David Zarembka Board President
Lynne Richman Board President
John Blieszner Treasurer
Jane Cooper Secretary
Lynn Caldwell Board Member
Anne Becker Board Member
Becky Blaine Secretary
Kay Lange Board Member
Tom Mahaffey Board Member
Mary Ann Tilton Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 10 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 36 points above the peer median (60 vs. 24).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.