Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 54 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 39 Fragile Recovery
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 39 Fragile Recovery
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kimberly Speckmann Board President
Laura Corn Board President
Asma Ali Treasurer
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary
Cristina De Leon Board Member
Kevin Drucker Board Member
Adam Gilbert Board Member
Heather Mueller Board Member
Martin Sarano Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kim Speckmann Board President
Laura Corn Board President
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary
Asma Ali Treasurer
Cristina DeLeon Board Member
April Proter Board Member
Athena Farrar Board Member
Kevin Drucker Board Member
Martin Sarano Board Member
Adam Gilbert Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kim Speckmann Board President
Laura Corn Board President
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary
Asma Ali Treasurer
Cristina DeLeon Board Member
April Proter Board Member
Athena Farrar Board Member
Kevin Drucker Board Member
Martin Sarano Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stetson Atwood Board President
Kim Speckmann Board President
Andrew Bozzelli Secretary
Kevin Drucker Treasurer
Asma Ali Board Member
Cristina DeLeon Board Member
Melanie Hellenga Board Member
April Proter Board Member
Martin Sarano Board Member
Laura Yocky Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 196 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points above the peer median (65 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.