Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 48.6% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 13.9% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 6.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 9.3% 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 10.5% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 10.0% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 7.6% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 3.3% 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 7.9% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 10.2% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 11.2% 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 8.3% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLES HARRIS II Board President
SIDNEY LEE Board President
KATE TILLOTSON Board President
DANIEL GORDON Treasurer
SUE E WALLACE Secretary
FREDERICK BATES Board Member
CHANEL W CONEY Board Member
REGINA CROSS Board Member
DINO DEVITA Board Member
E PATRICK JOHNSON Board Member
BRIENNE M LETOURNEAU Board Member
SYLVIA MARGOLIES Board Member
LAURA MATALON Board Member
MARCUS J NUNES Board Member
RAVEEN RAO Board Member
JEFFERY RAPPIN Board Member
SUSAN WEISS Board Member
TONY RUZICKA Board Member
FRANCES EXUME-BITOY Board Member
JUDITH GETHNER Board Member
RICHARD NONNWEILER Treasurer
KEN-MATT MARTIN Artistic Director

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERICA STRATER Executive Director 24.4% of Rev
RICHARD NONNWEILER Treasurer 18.3% of Rev
ROXANNA CONNER Board Member 12.8% of Rev
CHARLES HARRIS II Board President
SIDNEY LEE Board President
KATE TILLOTSON Board President
DANIEL GORDON Treasurer
SUE E WALLACE Secretary
FREDERICK BATES Board Member
CHANEL W CONEY Board Member
REGINA CROSS Board Member
DINO DEVITA Board Member
E PATRICK JOHNSON Board Member
BRIENNE M LETOURNEAU Board Member
SYLVIA MARGOLIES Board Member
LAURA MATALON Board Member
MARCUS J NUNES Board Member
RAVEEN RAO Board Member
JEFFERY RAPPIN Board Member
SUSAN WEISS Board Member
KEN-MATT MARTIN Artistic Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHAY YEW Artistic Director 29.0% of Rev
ERICA DANIELS Board Member 28.4% of Rev
RICHARD NONNWEILER Treasurer 18.8% of Rev
CHARLES HARRIS II Board President
SIDNEY LEE Board President
TONY RUZICKA Board President
KATE TILLOTSON Board President
DANIEL GORDON Treasurer
SUE E WALLACE Secretary
FREDERICK BATES Board Member
ANU BEHARI Board Member
PAMELLA CAPITANINI Board Member
CHANEL W CONEY Board Member
REGINA CROSS Board Member
DINO DEVITA Board Member
E PATRICK JOHNSON Board Member
JOHN KASTL Board Member
BRIENNE M LETOURNEAU Board Member
HON PAUL C LILLIOS Board Member
SYLVIA MARGOLIES Board Member
LAURA MATALON Board Member
STEVE MILLER Board Member
MARCUS J NUNES Board Member
RAVEEN RAO Board Member
JEFFERY RAPPIN Board Member
JAIME VITERI Board Member
SUSAN WEISS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points above the peer median (45 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 46 → 36 over 5 years (declining by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 48.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.