Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 34.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 53 Fragile Recovery
2020 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 56 Fragile Recovery
2018 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT BOLYARD Board President
DAVID POOLE Treasurer
JOHN WRIGHT Secretary
DAWN WADDELL Board President
GAIL MCDERMOTT-BOWLER Board Member
DARRIN SORLEY Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DARRIN SORLEY Board Member 19.1% of Rev
GAIL MCDERMOTT-BOWLER Board Member 15.7% of Rev
LAURA GOETZ Secretary
ROBERT BOLYARD Board President
DAVID POOLE Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANDREW KERR Board President
DAVID POOLE Treasurer
LAURA GOETZ Secretary
GAIL MCDERMOTT BOWLER Executive Director
LAURA GOETZ Secretary
DAVID POOLE Treasurer
ANDREW KERR Board President
GAIL MCDERMOTT BOWLER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 9 points below the peer median (42 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 34.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~26 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.