Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 4.3% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 8.3% 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 8.0% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 7.0% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 8.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2017 9.6% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 7.4% 42 Fragile Recovery
2015 9.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 8.4% 40 Fragile Recovery
2013 10.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 6.8% 44 Fragile Recovery
2011 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILLIP COLGLAZIER Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
EMILY SCHWARTZ KEIRNS Board President
JUSTIN T MOLITORIS Board President
BRIAN TERNET Treasurer
MATTHEW BOOKER SECRETERY
DAVID DYER Board Member
LEE FUHR Board Member
THOMAS MARCUCCILLI Board Member
DR JASON ROW MD Board Member
RENA SHOWN Board Member
JEFFREY S SLATER Board Member
STEPHANNY SMITH Board Member
LINDSEY C SWANSON Board Member
BRAD WANEK Board Member
STEVEN K ZACHER Board Member
MARGARET ANKENBRUCK Board Member
CATHERINE CHRISTOFF Board Member
JESSICA CRAFT Board Member
SHARON EISBART Board Member
SARAH GNAGY Board Member
LINDSEY SHARP Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILLIP COLGLAZIER Executive Director 7.5% of Rev
MERRY EWING Board President
EMILY SCHWARTZ KEIRNS Board President
AUDREY FRISON-ROBINSON Treasurer
SUSAN CHIPPS Secretary
ANDREW ABLES Board Member
MARGARET ANKENBRUCK Board Member
CHERI BECKER Board Member
RENA SHOWN Board Member
MICHAEL H GAVIN Board Member
JASON KUCHMAY Board Member
MARC E LEWIS Board Member
JIM MCCANN Board Member
JUSTIN T MOLITORIS Board Member
TONY PATRICK Board Member
MATTHEW REIBER Board Member
DR JASON ROW MD Board Member
SUZANNE M WAGNER Board Member
JAMES VELEZ Board Member
MARSHALL WEADICK Board Member
DAVID BELEW Board Member
DAVID DYER Board Member
DANIEL HANSEN Board Member
STEVEN K ZACHER Board Member
GARY WOLF Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHILLIP COLGLAZIER EXEC. DIREC. 7.4% of Rev
MERRY EWING Board President
EMILY SCHWARTZ KEIRNS Board President
AUDREY FRISON-ROBINSON Treasurer
SUSAN CHIPPS Secretary
ANDREW ABLES Board Member
MARGARET ANKENBRUCK Board Member
CHERI BECKER Board Member
RENA SHOWN Board Member
MICHAEL H GAVIN Board Member
JASON KUCHMAY Board Member
MARC E LEWIS Board Member
JIM MCCANN Board Member
JUSTIN T MOLITORIS Board Member
TONY PATRICK Board Member
MATTHEW REIBER Board Member
DR JASON ROW MD Board Member
SUZANNE M WAGNER Board Member
JAMES VELEZ Board Member
MARSHALL WEADICK Board Member
DAVID BELEW Board Member
DAVID DYER Board Member
DANIEL HANSEN Board Member
STEVEN K ZACHER Board Member
GARY WOLF Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.