Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
37
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 39.3% 37 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2023 — — 40.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 42.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 45.8% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 42.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 33.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — 14.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 32.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 13.4% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — 13.2% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Adam Bodony Artistic Director 20.0% of Rev
Cara Pittenger Executive Director 19.3% of Rev
Paul Helft Board Member —
Ben Kitterman Board Member —
Clint Meeks Treasurer —
David Wilcox Board Member —
Katelyn Leveque Board President —
Robert Goodlett Board Member —
Bethany Swain Stone Board Member —
Brian Snell Board Member —
Ronald Gilbert Board President —
Ellen Cannady Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Adam Bodony Artistic Director 20.0% of Rev
Janette Brown Executive Director 16.9% of Rev
Cara Pittenger Executive Director 2.4% of Rev
Paul Helft Board President —
Ben Kitterman Board President —
Connie Campbell Treasurer —
David Wilcox Board Member —
Katelyn Leveque Secretary —
Robert Goodlett Board Member —
Bethany Swain Stone Board Member —
Leonid Sirotkin Board Member —
Ronald Gilbert Board Member —
Tim Hogan Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Adam Bodony Artistic Director 19.8% of Rev
Janette Brown Executive Director 17.2% of Rev
Adam Bodony Artistic Director 15.9% of Rev
Janette Brown Executive Director 15.1% of Rev
Paul Helft Board President —
Ben Kitterman Board President —
Connie Campbell Treasurer —
Tara Ascioti Secretary —
David Wilcox Board Member —
Paul Helft Board President —
Brenda Clark Board Member —
Ben Kitterman Board President —
Robert Goodlett Board Member —
Connie Campbell Treasurer —
Chuck Kocal Board Member —
Tara Ascioti Secretary —
Susan Lutterbach-Nester Board Member —
Leonid Sirotkin Board Member —
Ronald Gilbert Board Member —
David Wilcox Board Member —
Tim Hogan Board Member —
Brenda Clark Board Member —
Robert Goodlett Board Member —
Chuck Kocal Board Member —
Susan Lutterbach-Nester Board Member —
Leonid Sirotkin Board Member —
Ronald Gilbert Board Member —
Tim Hogan Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 20 points below the peer median (42 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 39.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~35 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.