Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 17.8% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN BELL Executive Director 17.8% of Rev
LARRY CHURCH Board Member
NICK LAWRENCE Board Member
JEFF SUMLER Board President
ROBERT TRINKLE Secretary
LAURIE KEMP Board Member
AMANDA HARRIS Board President
DAN GRAF Treasurer
EMILY STUMLER Board Member
SAMANTHA ESCOBAR Board Member
HEATHER RAPP Board Member
KANA BROWN Board Member
CHRISTY HATFIELD Board Member
DANIELLE ARCHER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARRY CHURCH Board Member
NICK LAWRENCE Board President
CHERYL WILLS Board Member
JASON APPLEGATE Board Member
JD DOTSON Board Member
RIA SIEG Board President
JONI SCHMIDT Board Member
JEFF SUMLER Board Member
KIM MARTIN DAWKINS Board Member
ROBERT TRINKLE Secretary
DAVID SECKMAN Board Member
LISA REGER Board Member
GREG NICHOL Board Member
JOHN WOHRLE Board Member
RYAN SEA Board Member
NATASHA HAVERSTICK Treasurer
ALLISON UHL Board President
LAURIE KEMP Board Member
CHRISTEEN MOBURG Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICK LAWRENCE Board President
BRENDA EVANS Board Member
LAURIE KEMP Board President
JEFF SUMLER Board Member
KIM MARTIN DAWKINS Board Member
ROBERT TRINKLE Secretary
DONNA BURDEN Board Member
DR BRUCE KULWICKI Board Member
EMILY DIPPIE Board Member
NATASHA HAVERSTICK Treasurer
ALLISON UHL Board President
CHERYL WILLS Board Member
JASON APPLEGATE Board Member
JD DOTSON Board Member
ABIGAIL RICHMER Board Member
JONI SCHMIDT Board Member
DAVID SECKMAN Board Member
LISA REGER Board Member
RIA SIEG Board Member
GREG NICHOL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICOLA JACKSON Board Member
JEFF SUMLER VICE PRESIDE
KIM MARTIN DAWKINS Board Member
ROBERT TRINKLE Board Member
MINDY DABLOW Board Member
CHRISTINE EUKER Board Member
DONNA BURDEN Board Member
DR BRUCE KULWICKI Board Member
EMILY DIPPLE Board Member
NATASHA HAVERSTICK Board Member
PAT HARRISON EMERITUS
KELLY MARTIN Board Member
SELENA JONES Board Member
NICK LAWRENCE Secretary
SARAH PROVANCHER Board Member
TINA ISON Board Member
BRENDA EVANS Treasurer
LAURIE KEMP Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 121 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 20 points above the peer median (60 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.