Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
46
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 17.8% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN BELL Executive Director 17.8% of Rev
LARRY CHURCH Board Member —
NICK LAWRENCE Board Member —
JEFF SUMLER Board President —
ROBERT TRINKLE Secretary —
LAURIE KEMP Board Member —
AMANDA HARRIS Board President —
DAN GRAF Treasurer —
EMILY STUMLER Board Member —
SAMANTHA ESCOBAR Board Member —
HEATHER RAPP Board Member —
KANA BROWN Board Member —
CHRISTY HATFIELD Board Member —
DANIELLE ARCHER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARRY CHURCH Board Member —
NICK LAWRENCE Board President —
CHERYL WILLS Board Member —
JASON APPLEGATE Board Member —
JD DOTSON Board Member —
RIA SIEG Board President —
JONI SCHMIDT Board Member —
JEFF SUMLER Board Member —
KIM MARTIN DAWKINS Board Member —
ROBERT TRINKLE Secretary —
DAVID SECKMAN Board Member —
LISA REGER Board Member —
GREG NICHOL Board Member —
JOHN WOHRLE Board Member —
RYAN SEA Board Member —
NATASHA HAVERSTICK Treasurer —
ALLISON UHL Board President —
LAURIE KEMP Board Member —
CHRISTEEN MOBURG Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICK LAWRENCE Board President —
BRENDA EVANS Board Member —
LAURIE KEMP Board President —
JEFF SUMLER Board Member —
KIM MARTIN DAWKINS Board Member —
ROBERT TRINKLE Secretary —
DONNA BURDEN Board Member —
DR BRUCE KULWICKI Board Member —
EMILY DIPPIE Board Member —
NATASHA HAVERSTICK Treasurer —
ALLISON UHL Board President —
CHERYL WILLS Board Member —
JASON APPLEGATE Board Member —
JD DOTSON Board Member —
ABIGAIL RICHMER Board Member —
JONI SCHMIDT Board Member —
DAVID SECKMAN Board Member —
LISA REGER Board Member —
RIA SIEG Board Member —
GREG NICHOL Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NICOLA JACKSON Board Member —
JEFF SUMLER VICE PRESIDE —
KIM MARTIN DAWKINS Board Member —
ROBERT TRINKLE Board Member —
MINDY DABLOW Board Member —
CHRISTINE EUKER Board Member —
DONNA BURDEN Board Member —
DR BRUCE KULWICKI Board Member —
EMILY DIPPLE Board Member —
NATASHA HAVERSTICK Board Member —
PAT HARRISON EMERITUS —
KELLY MARTIN Board Member —
SELENA JONES Board Member —
NICK LAWRENCE Secretary —
SARAH PROVANCHER Board Member —
TINA ISON Board Member —
BRENDA EVANS Treasurer —
LAURIE KEMP Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 17 points below the peer median (45 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.