Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2023 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — — 44 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rob Angus Board Member —
Peggy Apgar Board Member —
Dalton Boyles Board Member —
Michael Compton Board Member —
Karen Crispin Board Member —
Lois Danner Board Member —
Jeri Doty Board Member —
Tatum Dyar Board Member —
Rachel Eversole-Jones Board Member —
Christi Fenton Board Member —
Sherrie Herner-Ellinger Board Member —
Zachary McCullough Board Member —
George Pfister Board Member —
Kosta Popovic Board Member —
Barbara Potter Board Member —
SARA SOLOOKI Board Member —
Teresa Stuckey Board Member —
Michael Tingley Board Member —
Christina Wittenmyer Board Member —
CHRIS NEWTON Board President —
MARY DINKEL Board President —
SUSAN BOUGH Secretary —
ANTHONY DINKEL Treasurer —
GREGORY ANDIS Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAT WHEELER Board Member —
HEATHER WILLIA Board Member —
SARA SOLOOKI Board President —
CHRIS NEWTON Board President —
MARY DINKEL Board President —
SUSAN BOUGH Secretary —
ANTHONY DINKEL Treasurer —
ROB ANGUS Board Member —
PEGGY APGAR Board Member —
MIKE COMPTON Board Member —
KAREN CRISPIN Board Member —
LOIS DANNER Board Member —
JERI DOTY Board Member —
CHRISTI FENTON Board Member —
MARK FREDERICK Board Member —
GARY GREINER Board Member —
SHERRIE HERNER Board Member —
DENISE KEEGAN Board Member —
ZACK MCCULLOUG Board Member —
KURT PERRY Board Member —
GEORGE PFISTER Board Member —
KOSTA POPOVIC Board Member —
BARBARA POTTER Board Member —
TRACY RICHARDS Board Member —
MAKENZIE SMOKS Board Member —
TERESA STUCKEY Board Member —
MIKE TINGLEY Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KOSTA POPOVIC Board Member —
BARBARA POTTER Board Member —
SARA SOLOOKI Board Member —
TERESA STUCKEY Board Member —
ANTHONY DINKEL Board President —
DEB HUMPHREY Board President —
GAIL HAYES Board President —
LORI VEARRIER Treasurer —
GARY GREINER Board President —
PEGGY APGAR Secretary —
SUSAN BOUGH Board Member —
KAREN CRISPIN Board Member —
LOIS DANNER Board Member —
DAVID DELCOLLE Board Member —
JERI DOTY Board Member —
MARY FISHER Board Member —
MARK FREDERICK Board Member —
SHERRIE HERNER Board Member —
JEFF JARRED Board Member —
DENISE KEEGAN Board Member —
TAMMY LUNDBORG Board Member —
ZACK MCCULLOUG Board Member —
CHRIS NEWTON Board Member —
KURT PERRY Board Member —
GEORGE PFISTER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 181 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 12 points below the peer median (50 vs. 62).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.