Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 56 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — — 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EMILY LAURANCE Board Member —
BUD STERN Board Member —
RICHARD LEDERMAN Board President —
FERN JENNINGS Board President —
DOUGLAS ROSE Treasurer —
MARTHA SOMACH Board Member —
MAX BUNKER Board President —
VERNON SACKMAN Board Member —
RUTH SIEGEL Board Member —
LOIS ROSE Board Member —
RICHARD FRIED Board Member —
TERRENCE O'MALLEY Board Member —
STEPHEN SOMACH Board Member —
BRUCE TYLER Board Member —
ROBERT BAUMANN Board Member —
DR MELVIN ARNOFF Board Member —
FRANK ELL Board Member —
DAVID ROTHENBERG Board Member —
BARBARA GREEN Board President —
TONI MILLER Board Member —
ERIC CHARNOFSKY Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MURRAY GOLDSTONE COUNSELOR —
BUD STERN Board Member —
RICHARD LEDERMAN Board President —
FERN JENNINGS Board President —
DOUGLAS ROSE Treasurer —
MARTHA SOMACH Board Member —
MAX BUNKER Board Member —
MURIEL BLACK Board Member —
CHARLOTTE PRICE Board Member —
LOIS ROSE Board President —
RICHARD FRIED Board Member —
TERRENCE O'MALLEY Board President —
LUANE LASKY Board Member —
BRUCE TYLER Board Member —
ROBERT BAUMANN Board Member —
DR MELVIN ARNOFF Board Member —
FRANK ELL Board Member —
DAVID ROTHENBERG COUNSELOR —
MATTHEW MAZUR Board Member —
TONI MILLER Board Member —
JAN MILIC Board Member —
ERIC CHARNOFSKY Board Member —
BARBARA GREEN Board Member —
STEPHEN SOMACH Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MURRAY GOLDSTONE COUNSELOR —
BUD STERN Board Member —
RICHARD LEDERMAN Board President —
FERN JENNINGS Board President —
DOUGLAS ROSE Treasurer —
MICHAEL DALBY Board Member —
MAX BUNKER Board Member —
MURIEL BLACK Board Member —
CHARLOTTE PRICE Board Member —
LOIS ROSE Board President —
RICHARD FRIED Board Member —
TERRENCE O'MALLEY Board Member —
LUANE LASKY Board Member —
BRUCE TYLER Board Member —
ROBERT BAUMANN Board Member —
DR MELVIN ARNOFF Board Member —
FRANK ELL Board Member —
DAVID ROTHENBERG COUNSELOR —
MATTHEW MAZUR Board Member —
VERONIC DEVER Board Member —
JAN MILIC Board Member —
ERIC CHARNOFSKY Board Member —
BARBARA GREEN Board Member —
STEPHEN SOMACH Board Member —
TONI MILLER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 329 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 13 points below the peer median (50 vs. 63).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.