Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
40
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 8.4% 40 Fragile Recovery
2022 8.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 13.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 12.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 7.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 9.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 8.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 8.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 8.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 12.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 9.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 8.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH BROWN ELLIS EXECUTIVE DI 8.7% of Rev
RICHARD BALES VICE-PRESIDE
JOHN FICORILLI Board Member
JIM GIDEON Board Member
CHRIS HENDERSON Board Member
CHAD HUGHES Board Member
KARI KUHN Board President
TY LOTZ Board Member
KEN MALCOLM Treasurer
MARTHA MANCHESTER Board Member
JACKIE MARTELL Board Member
CHANDRA NEEPER Board Member
CHRISTINE O'NEILL Board Member
KRISTEN OSBUN-MANLEY Board Member
AMY PHILLIPS Board Member
EVANS PSEEKOS Board Member
STACEY REINEKE Board Member
FATHER DAVID ROSS Board Member
JIM SMELTZLY Board Member
MELISSA SPONSELLER Secretary
CHAD STEARNS Board Member
NANCY STROH Board Member
BRANDI TRUEBLOOD Board Member
ANITA UETRECHT Board Member
JEFF UNTERBRINK Board Member
BARBARA YOUNG Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELIZABETH BROWN Executive Director 9.4% of Rev
NEIL DARR Board Member
KEITH DAVIS Board Member
CHRIS DIBIASIO Board Member
DONALD WITTER Board Member
STEVE JOHNSON Board Member
MARTHA MACDONELL Board Member
STACEY REINEKE Board Member
FR DAVID ROSS Board Member
ANITA UETRECHT Board Member
SHANNON WANNEMACHER Board President
BEN DIEPENBROCK Treasurer
JIM GIDEON Board Member
NATASHA KAUFMAN Board Member
JAN HAWK Secretary
WILLIAM WALTER Board Member
STEPHANIE HOLTZ Board Member
TY LOTZ Board President
JEFF UNTERBRINK Board Member
OMAR ZEHERY Board Member
LYNN SCHAUB Board Member
CHAD STEARNS Board Member
DOUG CORWIN Board Member
KARI KUHN Board Member
DENNIS RICHARDSON Board Member
MELISSA SPONSELLER Board Member
AUTUMN SWANSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.