Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 34.0% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 38.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 22.4% 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 14.3% 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 13.9% 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 13.6% 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 19.6% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 18.9% 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 26.4% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 26.9% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 28.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 18.0% 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM RUDMAN Artistic Director 11.1% of Rev
KATHYRN MAVER MARKETING DI 7.3% of Rev
JACK WARREN Executive Director 1.4% of Rev
BONNIE KANE BARENHOLTZ Board Member
LIN BARTEL Board Member
MARILYN BROWN Board President
THEODORE S CHAPIN Board Member
ROBERT CONRAD Board Member
DAVID KANZEG Board Member
JANET KRAMER Board Member
HEDY MILGROM Board Member
TREVA OFFUTT Board Member
MICHAEL PETERMAN Treasurer
JANE STEGER Secretary
JON MILLER STEIGER VICE PRESIDE
BARBARA VITCOSKY MARKETING DI

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM RUDMAN Artistic Director 9.7% of Rev
HEATHER MEEKER FORMER EXEC 9.7% of Rev
BONNIE KANE BARENHOLTZ Board Member
LIN BARTEL Board Member
MARILYN BROWN Board Member
THEODORE S CHAPIN Board Member
KATHY COLEMAN Board Member
ROBERT CONRAD Board Member
DAVID KANZEG Board Member
HEDY MILGROM Board Member
TREVA OFFUTT Board Member
JANE STEGER Board Member
JON MILLER STEIGER Board Member
MARGIE WHEELER Board Member
TRACEY DWYER FORMER MANAG
JANET KRAMER Board President
MICHAEL PETERMAN Treasurer
LORRAINE SZABO Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEATHER MEEKER EXECUTIVE DI 11.5% of Rev
WILLIAM RUDMAN Artistic Director 11.2% of Rev
BONNIE KANE BARENHOLTZ Board Member
LIN BARTEL Board Member
MARILYN BROWN Board Member
MICHAEL COLE Board Member
KATHY COLEMAN Board Member
ROBERT CONRAD Board Member
COURTNEY FLOWERS Board Member
LAINIE HADDEN Board Member
DAVID KANZEG Board Member
HEDY MILGROM Board Member
MICHAEL PETERMAN Board Member
LAURA PINNICK Board Member
JON MILLER STEIGER Board Member
MARGIE WHEELER Board Member
TRACEY DWYER Executive Director
HOWARD EPSTEIN Board President
JANET KRAMER Treasurer
JANE STEGER Board President
LORRAINE SZABO Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9,337 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix B9.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 28 over 5 years (declining by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.