Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 60 Stable Stable Watch
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
POLLY MAPLE Secretary
TABITHA PATTERSON Treasurer
DAVE ALLEN VICE PRESIDE
SHANNA WEAVER Secretary
TABITHA PATTERSON Treasurer
CHARLES WEAVER Board President
DAVE ALLEN VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TABITHA PATTERSON Secretary
CHARLES WEAVER Board President
KEN STOCKER VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE HAWKINS Treasurer
TABITHA PATTERSON Secretary
VONDA HUNT Board President
AMY BOURNE Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 49 points above the peer median (90 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.