Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 57 Fragile Recovery
2023 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 28.0% 58 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 57 Fragile Recovery
2013 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN S FOSTER Executive Director 20.9% of Rev
K ZAHERRAH SULTAN Board President
BILLICA C HINES Secretary
KEMATI J PORTER Secretary
RACHEL DICKSON Treasurer
RENEE L CHARLOW Board President
K ZAHERRAH SULTAN Board President
CHARLES WINFREY PARLIMENTARIAN
BILLICA C HINES Secretary
GARY ANDERSON Board President
KAYA J DUNN Secretary
IRIS MIDDLETON GRADUATE LAISON
RACHEL DICKSON Treasurer
ANDRE HARRINGTON Board President
KEMATI J PORTER Treasurer
ERIC J LITTLE PARLIMENTARIAN
EILEEN J MORRIS CONSULTANT
GARY ANDERSON Board President
MICHAEL D DINWIDDIE CONSULTANT
MUTIYAT ADE-SALU GRADUATE LAISON
KATHRYN ERVIN CONSULTANT
ANDRE HARRINGTON Board President
GREGORY J HORTON CONSULTANT
JOHN S FOSTER CONSULTANT
EILEEN J MORRIS CONSULTANT
MICHAEL D DINWIDDIE CONSULTANT
KATHRYN ERVIN CONSULTANT
GREGORY J HORTON CONSULTANT
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (80 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 57 over 5 years (improving by 28 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.