Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 2.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 19.5% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 27.5% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Neil Scheibelhut Board Member 2.1% of Rev
Anthony Salintinio Board President 1.3% of Rev
Diana Strongosky Board President 0.7% of Rev
Jason Kurlychek Treasurer
Kristy Whitaker Secretary
Jenna Messina Board Member
Larry Napoli Board Member
Cheri Janas Board Member
Jen Justice Board Member
Evelyn Stevens Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michele Bender Board Member 9.0% of Rev
Jennifer Sindyla Board Member 1.9% of Rev
Neil Scheibelhut Board Member 1.8% of Rev
Anthony Salatino Board President 0.9% of Rev
Diana Strongosky Board President 0.7% of Rev
Jason Kurlychek Treasurer
Kristy Whittaker Secretary
Jen Justice Board Member
Evelyn Stevens Board Member
Cheri Janas Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Frankie Castrovillari Board Member 1.5% of Rev
Diane Strongosky Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Donald Lloyd Board President
Joy Parker Board Member
Jason Kurlychek Treasurer
Joy Parker Board President
Jen Justice Board Member
Evelyn Stevens Board Member
Cheri Janas Board Member
Kenneth Maresh Board Member
Jacqueline Royak Administrator
Michele Bender Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michele Bender Board Member 9.3% of Rev
Diane Strongosky Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Donald Lloyd Board President
Joy Parker Board Member
Jason Kurlychek Treasurer
Joy Parker Board President
Jen Justice Board Member
Evelyn Stevens Board Member
Cheri Janas Board Member
Kenneth Maresh Board Member
Jacqueline Royak Administrator
Frankie Castrovillari Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michele Bender Board Member 9.3% of Rev
Donald Lloyd Board President
Joy Parker Board Member
Jason Kurlychek Treasurer
Joy Parker Board President
Diane Strongosky Board Member
Jen Justice Board Member
Evelyn Stevens Board Member
Cheri Janas Board Member
Kenneth Maresh Board Member
Jacqueline Royak Administrator
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points above the peer median (75 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.