Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 23.8% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 20.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 22.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 11.5% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 27.5% 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2010 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CELESTE COSENTINO EXEC ARTISTI 23.8% of Rev
ANNE BLUM Board President
RANNIGAN WALSH Board President
CYNTHIA DETTLEBACH Secretary
MIKE RUSEK Treasurer
MICHAEL BEYER Board Member
SCOTT ESPOSITO Board Member
BENOY JOSEPH Board Member
THOMAS MOORE Board Member
LAWANNA WHITE Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CELESTE COSENTINO EXEC ARTISTI 23.8% of Rev
BENOY JOSEPH Board Member
THOMAS MOORE Board Member
LAWANNA WHITE Board Member
ANNE BLUM Board President
RANNIGAN WALSH Board President
CYNTHIA DETTLEBACH Secretary
MICHAEL BEYER Board Member
DEBORAH BUCKLEY Board Member
SCOTT ESPOSITO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CELESTE COSENTINO EXEC ARTISTI 21.2% of Rev
ANNE BLUM Board President
RANNIGAN WALSH VICE-PRESIDE
IAN HINZ INTERIM TREA
CYNTHIA DETTLEBACH Secretary
MICHAEL BEYER Board Member
SCOTT ESPOSITO Board Member
BENOY JOSEPH Board Member
THOMAS MOORE Board Member
DERDRIU RING Board Member
LAWANNA WHITE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CELESTE COSENTINO EXECUTIVE DI 18.6% of Rev
BENOY JOSEPH Board President
ANNE BLUM Board President
RICK SZEKELYI Treasurer
CYNTHIA DETTLEBACH Secretary
MICHAEL BEYER Board Member
SCOTT ESPOSITO Board Member
IAN HINZ Board Member
DERDRIU RING Board Member
THOMAS MOORE Board Member
LAWANNA WHITE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CELESTE COSENTINO EXECUTIVE DI 15.6% of Rev
BENOY JOSEPH Board President
ANNE BLUM Board President
IAN HINZ Treasurer
CYNTHIA DETTLEBACH Secretary
MICHAEL BEYER Board Member
SCOTT ESPOSITO Board Member
JEN HOLLAND Board Member
RICK SZEKELYI Board Member
THOMAS MOORE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 6 points below the peer median (45 vs. 51).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.