Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEL JOHNSON Secretary
CINDY LIGHT Board President
PATTY SCHUALL 1ST VICE PRE
BETH HARRIS Treasurer
RACHEL GRIGGS 2ND VICE PRE

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JASON CHANDLER Secretary
CINDY LIGHT Board President
MARINA BAYLESS 1ST VICE PRE
BETH HARRIS Treasurer
DAVE COREY 2ND VICE PRE
RACHEL GRIGGS CORRESP SECR

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JASON CHANDLER Secretary
CINDY LIGHT Board President
MARINA BAYLESS 1ST VICE PRE
BETH HARRIS Treasurer
DAVE COREY 2ND VICE PRE
RACHEL GRIGGS CORRESP SECR
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 49 points above the peer median (90 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 55 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.