Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 42 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2021 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2011 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN ROLLINS Board President
DAN ROBERTS Board President
PATRICIA CHAVARRIA FINANCIAL OFFICER
LISA ISAACSON Secretary
AARON MUSGROVE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHEN ROLLINS Board President
Patricia K Chavarria Secretary
DAN ROBERTS Board President
LISA ISAACSON TREASURY
AARON MUSGROVE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 47 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.